Database of Algonquian Language Structures

  • Structural survey
  • Verb forms
  • Nominal forms
  • Phonology
  • Bibliography

  • Register
  • Log in
Languages
Search
Languages
Southwestern Ojibwe 100% Nishnaabemwin 100% Northern Algonquin 100% Proto-Algonquian 100% Atikamekw 100% Moose Cree 100% Miami-Illinois 100% Meskwaki 100% Odawa 99% Penobscot 83% Menominee 74% Munsee 74% More...
Search
Nominal paradigm Verb paradigm Verb form Phonology Text

TA verbs with inanimate actor

Basic details Datapoints Languages
Can the actor of a TA verb be grammatically inanimate?
        • Meskwaki: yes
        • Kickapoo: yes
      • Miami-Illinois: yes
      • Shawnee: yes
      • Menominee: yes
          • Southwestern Ojibwe: yes
          • Odawa: yes
          • Nishnaabemwin: yes
          • Northern Algonquin: yes
          • Plains Cree: yes
          • Swampy Cree: yes
          • Moose Cree: yes
          • Atikamekw: yes
          • Southern East Cree: not provided in paradigms
          • Northern East Cree: not provided in paradigms
          • Sheshatshiu Innu: unknown/unclear (Charts don't specify numbering for inanimate)
      • Mi'kmaq: yes
      • Maliseet-Passamaquoddy: unknown/unclear (Charts don't specify numbering for inanimate.)
        • Penobscot: yes
        • Munsee: yes
        • Unami: yes
        • Massachusett: yes
      • Cheyenne: yes
        • Arapaho: not provided in paradigms
        • Gros Ventre: not provided in paradigms
      • Blackfoot: unknown/unclear (Actors of TA verbs cannot be semantically inanimate; "knife" is an animate noun but can't be the actor of a TA. However, Frantz does note that some speakers allow for inanimate actors if the object is the experiencer (e.g. "it frightens him").)
  • Home
  • About
  • Other resources